Just got one of these:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00...ls_o05_s00_i00
https://vimeo.com/22908542
Haven't fitted it yet, but for $20 brand new, you can't go wrong!![]()
Results 11 to 15 of 15
-
Senior Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2010
- Posts
- 160
08-23-2012 09:32 AM
-
Junior Member
- Join Date
- May 2010
- Location
- Brisbane, Australia
- Posts
- 17
08-23-2012 11:32 PM
This lens may not be the same as the one in the video that you refer to. Seb does not show the 3.5mm lens there, but the 6mm is a c mount.
It may vignette badly even in ETC mode. At this stage, you do tend to get what you pay for with wide c mount lenses. This is a CS mount lens in all probability? The video lens was over twice the cost and had detailed range etc so likely to be a c mount lens.
This will give interesting full coverage macro, though?
I hope I am wrong. I have not bought or if I have not tried this lens on my epm-1
Looking forward to seeing your images, even if disappointing?Last edited by Pat_Donnelly; 08-23-2012 at 11:41 PM.
-
Senior Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2010
- Posts
- 343
08-28-2012 10:45 AM
use all the time for my films. Mostly Pentax range from B&H are great quality.
https://vimeo.com/32704333 shot with Pentax 25mm 1.4
-
Junior Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2012
- Posts
- 1
10-30-2012 06:14 AM
Hi there,
I am using both, a Schneider Kreuznach Variogon f2 18-90mm and a Canon TV Zoom V6x17 2/17-102mm on an industrial High-speed camera with c-mount and a sensor of about 16mmx12mm.
while the Schneider vignettes clearly a bit on the shorter end the Canon Zoom shows only very little vignetting with the iris fully open.
But I have another question: Both these lenses behave on my camera in a strange way: Only at a focal length of higher than approx. 30mm behave the focus rings normal, i.e. according to their marks.
Below 30mm they work reversed: to focus in distance I have to bring the focus ring to close and vice versa.
Furthermore, focusing on a an object with a long focal length and zooming out again, the focus does not stay correct. I guess it is for the same reason as the other issue.
First I thought it was a defect of one lens but as they both behave similiar I doubt it. I cannot exclude that the flansh of my camera is not perfect but it shoulndn't give reason for the above mentioned behaviour.
anyone has some ideas? Thanks!
-
Senior Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2011
- Location
- London, England
- Posts
- 391
10-30-2012 06:37 AM
I bought one a while back for £20 of ebay.
It's a bit pointless really. Ok quality, and has very swirly bokeh which I've not seen on any other lens, but I've only ever used it twice.





