Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. Collapse Details
    Good enough for TV series?
    #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    373
    Default
    Is the HPX250 good enough to be an "A" camera for a television series?
    And could an AC160 match close enough for a "B" or "C" camera?


    Reply With Quote
     

  2. Collapse Details
    #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    37
    Default
    I used my 250 to shoot some footage for MSG+ and Fox Sports late last month and it went to air and mixed well with other clips they had shot previously on HDCAM. In fact after it gets ingested into the EVS and transcoded and sent to Vyvx, HTN or whatever and ends up on your TV at home any source material will loose quality. But to answer your question, yes, I think it is good enough. I was shooting 1080/60i for MSG, Fox Sports does everything in 720/60p.

    Just a note, Fox Sports regional shoot 80% of their game day ENG on 160's, ever watch a Fox sports game on TV? You would be hard pressed to tell what was shot on what.


    Reply With Quote
     

  3. Collapse Details
    #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Charlottesville, va
    Posts
    1,353
    Default
    It's approved by the BBC for HD production, in-camera recording. So, yes. Channels like discovery typically have similar camera requirements.

    Not sure on the AC160/130 qualifications.


    Reply With Quote
     

  4. Collapse Details
    #4
    Bronze Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    4,643
    Default
    Quote Originally Posted by mcbob View Post
    Not sure on the AC160/130 qualifications.
    I'm sure the AC160 could qualify paired with a Nano...and I wouldn't be surprised if native AVCHD footage ends up being used a lot as well.


    Reply With Quote
     

  5. Collapse Details
    #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Charlottesville, va
    Posts
    1,353
    Default
    Probably right on that, considering the AF100 is OK'd w/ a Nano


    Reply With Quote
     

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •