Still a rumour ...
....but nice. 12 or 14 mm would have been even nicer.
Results 1 to 10 of 64
02-06-2012 10:54 AM
Odd focal length to add at this point. A wider angle lens would have seemed a no brainer, & better seller.
Or a portrait lens with closer minimum focus distance than Voigtlander's M mounts. A 35/1.2, or 50/1.0, would be sweet.
02-06-2012 11:19 AM
- Join Date
- Sep 2003
A portrait lens would have been fantastic. 35/0.95 would have been perfect. Of course, there's the Zeiss 35/1.4 now, so, really, not that much need I guess. Whereas the ZF 18mm is an f/3.5, and the Voigtlander is f/0.95, so yeah, I'm looking at this new V pretty ravenously. That's nearly four stops faster... sixteen times as much light...
02-06-2012 02:01 PM
I have a Voigtländer 35/1.2 and it's a very nice portrait lens. Fast enough at F1.2 also.
02-06-2012 06:48 PM
- Join Date
- Mar 2010
Did you guys note that it had the option to go 'clickless' on aperture by moving the ring forward?
02-06-2012 08:16 PM
I think I'm going to get one (when they are available) and just tell myself it's 35mm.
Sure have enjoyed my 25 f/0.95.GH3, Lumix 7-14, 12-35, 14-140, Voigtlander 25/.95
02-06-2012 09:49 PM
Status has changed from rumour to announcement it seems...
Last edited by Rolf Silber; 02-06-2012 at 10:59 PM.
02-11-2012 05:30 AM
And here we are....
..... de-clickable aperture & 15 cm minimum focal distance. Yes.