Consistent accurate focus marks - the big one.
Parfocal.
Often faster, but not always (t-stops vs f-stops is mostly irrelevant in the digital age).
Better/longer focus throw.
Geared for follow focus / zoom motor / FIZ use.
Stronger mount - no shifting during focus and superior durability.
Color matched - of debatable importance since zooms and primes from different manufacturers are often mixed.
Consistent size from lens to lens within a set - both body size and front diameter (not all cine lenses meet this goal, especially older ones).
Lack of breathing (not the case with all older cine lenses, especially zooms).
Internal focus (again not attained by older cine lenses).
All manual/mechanical operation including aperture.
Clickless aperture - much less important than the internet claims.
Everything else that comes with expense but not necessarily with cinefication, including sharper images @ wide open aperture.
Did I miss anything?
As mentioned, if you can afford cinema lenses you should probably be shooting with a real movie camera, not a DSLR.
Sorry for jumping the gun, 20 hours is too long for me to wait for ANYTHING lol ;)
Results 11 to 20 of 50
-
Senior Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2011
- Posts
- 511
01-25-2012 10:03 AM
Last edited by nothing; 01-25-2012 at 01:22 PM.
-
-
Senior Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2011
- Posts
- 511
-
Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Location
- Toronto
- Posts
- 2,773
01-25-2012 01:38 PM
...Should budget and crew size be a factor in this discussion ? ( Cine lenses are not usually compact or light weight )
Cameras : Panasonic GH3 with Grip, Panasonic GH2, Panasonic HMC-150
OIS Zoom : Lumix 12-35mm f/2.8, Lumix 35-100mm f/2.8
-
-
Senior Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Location
- cornwall UK
- Posts
- 3,318
01-25-2012 03:16 PM
On the fora I like to push the other argument !
Now I know sometimes in business you have to just buy the right tool
Over the years I have bought some tools, a 4002.8 when I was photographing football as a 'kid', a Sound Devices recorder when doing a series of interviews with a DSLR, a hasselblad H and lenses for my photographic studio, what about a proper cine zoom ??
With my FS100 I have been ripping myself apart with still lenses
Bad focus travel , growing zooms that hit the filters in your matte box, pinging nuns knickers.. it all sucks
I can see and feel every little thing that makes cine glass wonderful
Now its to me an economic decision.
You and your crew have X hours in the day and Y dollars in the bag
Every move of a follow focus, readjustment of the matte box, bum focus pull - it all costs you in your day
Reduces the productive footage shot - cine lenses save money
Now I really thought about this, but it seems that 98% of shoots have other things that they could spend their money on
Better art, more time, a better location, more lights and grip
Honestly I think cine lenses just don't add up on a lot of shoots.. of course they do on some
A well selected set of old still glass really is, however, a very good choice in many circumstances
S
-
Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2011
- Posts
- 82
01-26-2012 08:44 AM
dont forget constant F-stop throughout the zoom range!!
-
-
Senior Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2011
- Posts
- 511
01-26-2012 08:52 AM
.
That's not a cinema lens feature, that's just a non-crap lens feature - and according to Canon, not a requirement for cinema lenses at all! I disagree with them on this point and believe it severely cripples the Canon 30-300 cinema lens.Last edited by nothing; 01-26-2012 at 09:02 AM.
-
Moderator
- Join Date
- Sep 2003
- Posts
- 49,168
01-26-2012 12:28 PM









