FS100 and AF100 compared

[TheReverend]

Did we ever find out which shot was the FS100 and which was the AF100?

[Barry_Green]

First is FS100, second is AF100.

[TimurCivan]

Wow. Really?

I like the second better.

[Rick Burnett]

First is FS100, second is AF100.

My eyes didn't deceive me! But as I said, honestly, I'd be happy with either. They are so close to one another.

[bgundu]

Yeah I think the Af100 definitely made the acting better in the second one.

[Mike Harvey]

My AF arrives on Thursday, and honestly, seeing that AF/FS comparison doesn't discourage me about my choice at all. Both looked ridiculously good for being in the $4,500 - $5,000 range.

[Postmaster]

First is FS100, second is AF100.

Bummer - I was 95% sure it was the opposite.

Frank

[Rick Burnett]

Bummer - I was 95% sure it was the opposite.

Frank

I think some people were focusing on the red in the second shot as being FS100, but when I looked at it closely, it's not what I generally see out of the box on the FS100. I had to hunt down the differences, I couldn't tell at an easy glance of both, and I think that speaks for itself.

[ian_h]

Clearly [cough] the differences between the images of these cameras are pretty subtle.

[Steve Kahn]

Wow. Really?

I like the second better.

Maybe it's because the exposures are not the same but the highlights look better on the AF100!