Page 5 of 9 FirstFirst 123456789 LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 86
  1. Collapse Details
    #41
    Default
    Quote Originally Posted by PDR View Post
    can you please provide more information on the test conditions, settings used ... ?
    Test conditions were not lab perfect. Simply lighting a chart with a lamp and pointing the camera at it. Lens used was a zeiss 35mm stopped down to f/4. Iso at 200. Cinema D gamma. Detail levels turned down.
    chartcenter.jpg

    I mean this is definitely of decent quality, but knowing the gh2 has higher rez is somewhat frustrating.


    Reply With Quote
     

  2. Collapse Details
     

  3. Collapse Details
    #43
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    vancouver bc
    Posts
    178
    Default
    No details on the af-100 setup that I could see.

    So many people are eager for the 100 to fail because it proves that the pro divisions are still getting bested by the stills guys. It's the awesome deal. It's the underdog, it's thinking you got way more than you paid for.

    For us the res charts don't matter at all. We can't shoot on a gh2. It doesn't fit our workflow and there'd be too much screwing around to make it work for what we need it for.

    AF100 is exactly what we need


    Reply With Quote
     

  4. Collapse Details
    #44
    Default
    Quote Originally Posted by walnutcrunch View Post
    No details on the af-100 setup that I could see.

    So many people are eager for the 100 to fail because it proves that the pro divisions are still getting bested by the stills guys. It's the awesome deal. It's the underdog, it's thinking you got way more than you paid for.

    For us the res charts don't matter at all. We can't shoot on a gh2. It doesn't fit our workflow and there'd be too much screwing around to make it work for what we need it for.

    AF100 is exactly what we need
    I think that's probably true of most people who have bought the AF100. If about much more than resolution.


    Reply With Quote
     

  5. Collapse Details
    #45
    Bronze Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    300
    Default
    So if we will make our movie with gh2 we need to use chart instead of actor? If we make with af100 we use people, not chart? Can someone esplain? Lol!


    Reply With Quote
     

  6. Collapse Details
    #46
    Default
    Quote Originally Posted by ghosttv View Post
    So if we will make our movie with gh2 we need to use chart instead of actor? If we make with af100 we use people, not chart? Can someone esplain? Lol!
    Um.... not following you.


    Reply With Quote
     

  7. Collapse Details
    #47
    Bronze Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    300
    Default
    Gh2 is best for movie about charts, af100 best for movie about peoples. Sorry I try make a jok.


    Reply With Quote
     

  8. Collapse Details
    #48
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    vancouver bc
    Posts
    178
    Default
    Okay Mr. smart guy ghosttv...what do you use when you want to make a movie about people holding charts. What then?


    Reply With Quote
     

  9. Collapse Details
    #49
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    El Cerrito CA
    Posts
    909
    Default
    If the test had shown the AF100 to be the best, I'm hoping that everyone would have been unanimous in that the resolution is irrelevant. Myself I'm looking forward to some nice, low alias shots
    IF MY CAMERA ARRIVES HELLO PANASONIC KNOCK DING DING
    HD Video: GH2, XA 10s HF G10s
    Microphones: Sennheiser MKH 80 MKH20 MKH40
    Neumann 11-pattern dual capsule main pair by Rens Heijnis
    Schoeps MK2, MK2H, MK21, MK41 CMC6 amps
    12 custom ribbons of my own design
    Digital Editing: Sequoia
    Snapshots: Olympus E-PL1



    Reply With Quote
     

  10. Collapse Details
    #50
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Philippines
    Posts
    2,438
    Default
    Quote Originally Posted by astigmatic View Post
    I mean this is definitely of decent quality, but knowing the gh2 has higher rez is somewhat frustrating.
    Exact same sentiments. But other than that i still love my baby despite its flaws

    Edit:
    Based on my side by side test with a t2i,
    Af100 resolves more detail (but imperceivable)
    gamma can be graded on the 550d to match the af100
    You can intercut both seamlessly
    Last edited by dcloud; 02-13-2011 at 11:31 PM.


    Reply With Quote
     

Page 5 of 9 FirstFirst 123456789 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •