Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. Collapse Details
    ATM89R Hypercardioid Condenser?
    #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    173
    Default
    It's my understanding that a hypercardioid condenser mic is the way to go when recording dialog indoors. However, I saw the Audio Technica ATM89R hypercardioid condenser mic at a great price but it looks more like a vocalist's mic used for live performances than a mic for recording audio/dialog for film. Despite it's design, I was wondering if it would achieve the desired results or am I totally looking at the wrong kind of mic?


    Reply With Quote
     

  2. Collapse Details
    #2
    Default
    What you will most likely find is that a condenser microphone for handheld use will be far less sensitive and pencil-type condensers. There has been much written about the problems with using low sensitivity mics with recorders such as the Zoom H4n. If I'm interpreting the specs correctly, the Rode NTG-3 is twice as sensitive as the ATM89R.

    The AT is rated at -42 dB (7.9 mV) re 1V at 1 Pa whereas the Rode is rated at -30 dB re 1 Volt/Pascal (31.6 mV @ 94 dB SPL) +/- 2 dB @ 1kHz.

    So, all this is saying that a handheld vocal mic is simply not the right tool to be using at the end of the boom pole.


    Reply With Quote
     

  3. Collapse Details
    #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    BC, Canada
    Posts
    857
    Default
    Adding to gpforet, mics for handheld use are also much heavier than your typical SDC mic. At the end of a boom, every ounce matters.


    Reply With Quote
     

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •