Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 32
  1. Collapse Details
    Does anyone use the kit lens for anything?
    #1
    Joystick Member Richard J. Johnson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    4,989
    Default
    I'm about to spend a lot of money on glass and kind of forgot about the lens I have already. Is it good for anything. I'm late to the 7D party so if there is another thread please direct me to it.

    Canon 7D+Teddybear T-Finder+Tamron & Canon Glass+lighting+a bunch of other stuff+2 Beautiful Babies.

    "Torn" Available now!
    http://www.rsquaredfilms.com/films/torn.html

    Vimeo Channel: http://vimeo.com/channels/47561

    "RaZoRbLaDe cItY" December 2010. A Maverick Entertainment Release
    http://www.maverickentertainment.cc/...azorblade-city


    Reply With Quote
     

  2. Collapse Details
    #2
    Default
    Lower-performing kit lenses are good for situations in when there's a higher than average risk of damage.




    Reply With Quote
     

  3. Collapse Details
    #3
    Joystick Member Richard J. Johnson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    4,989
    Default
    LOL. That is great. So pretty much worthless unless I'm skydiving? I wish I had been more educated on the lens factor when I bought it. I would have gotten the Tamron or something and spent a little more.

    Canon 7D+Teddybear T-Finder+Tamron & Canon Glass+lighting+a bunch of other stuff+2 Beautiful Babies.

    "Torn" Available now!
    http://www.rsquaredfilms.com/films/torn.html

    Vimeo Channel: http://vimeo.com/channels/47561

    "RaZoRbLaDe cItY" December 2010. A Maverick Entertainment Release
    http://www.maverickentertainment.cc/...azorblade-city


    Reply With Quote
     

  4. Collapse Details
    #4
    Default
    What lens did you get? The 18-135 isn't bad for video work, and it has a pretty decent range. Only real problem with it is that it's slow, but then again, all kit lenses are usually quite slow.


    Reply With Quote
     

  5. Collapse Details
    #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Birdsboro, PA
    Posts
    302
    Default
    Yea as far as the quality of the glass. kit lenses are usually s*%t. The main difference you will see (if you can get past the fact that they are usually slower than a turtle with a broken leg) is the CA, distortion , vignetting, less bokeh and general lack of sharpness compared to their more expensive counterparts.

    Personally, I would use them as a somewhat comical doorstop, problem is that kit lenses can't even do that well.


    Reply With Quote
     

  6. Collapse Details
    #6
    Joystick Member Richard J. Johnson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    4,989
    Default
    Yeah. I have the 18-35. With the other glass I hope to purchase friday. I don't know how much use it will get.

    Quote Originally Posted by Barry_Green View Post
    What lens did you get? The 18-135 isn't bad for video work, and it has a pretty decent range. Only real problem with it is that it's slow, but then again, all kit lenses are usually quite slow.

    Canon 7D+Teddybear T-Finder+Tamron & Canon Glass+lighting+a bunch of other stuff+2 Beautiful Babies.

    "Torn" Available now!
    http://www.rsquaredfilms.com/films/torn.html

    Vimeo Channel: http://vimeo.com/channels/47561

    "RaZoRbLaDe cItY" December 2010. A Maverick Entertainment Release
    http://www.maverickentertainment.cc/...azorblade-city


    Reply With Quote
     

  7. Collapse Details
    #7
    Default
    Quote Originally Posted by N635DC View Post
    The main difference you will see ... is the CA, distortion , vignetting, less bokeh and general lack of sharpness compared to their more expensive counterparts.
    In stills, yes.

    In video, no. I've tested this to death, and the kit lenses on the GH1 and 7D are just as sharp in video mode as the best high-buck still lenses. The video mode on the DSLR is "the great equalizer."


    Reply With Quote
     

  8. Collapse Details
    #8
    Default
    Quote Originally Posted by Richard J. Johnson View Post
    Yeah. I have the 18-35. With the other glass I hope to purchase friday. I don't know how much use it will get.
    Might be able to sell it for a few hundred, I think it goes for like $400-$500 on B&H...


    Reply With Quote
     

  9. Collapse Details
    #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Birdsboro, PA
    Posts
    302
    Default
    Quote Originally Posted by Barry_Green View Post
    In stills, yes.

    In video, no. I've tested this to death, and the kit lenses on the GH1 and 7D are just as sharp in video mode as the best high-buck still lenses. The video mode on the DSLR is "the great equalizer."
    Interesting, I still haven't jumped on the "still camera body for video" bandwagon. Call me old fashioned. Have you hammered out why the lens gives different results in video mode?


    Reply With Quote
     

  10. Collapse Details
    #10
    Default
    Because the resolution is so much less. It's only 1080, and it's definitely not a raw image.


    Reply With Quote
     

Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •