Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. Collapse Details
    redone vs. SI-2k vs. f23 vs. f900 vs. phantom hd vs. EX1
    #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    1
    Default
    there is the link, the test is in spanish.

    www.ccdcolombia.com/comparativo/comparativo2.htm


    Reply With Quote
     

  2. Collapse Details
    #2
    Default
    If peeps are a) interested, and b) monolingual:

    http://translate.google.com/translat...-8&sl=es&tl=en

    Good review, though pretty short, given how many cameras they were testing.

    Thanks for the link!


    Reply With Quote
     

  3. Collapse Details
    #3
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    26
    Default
    Quote Originally Posted by lovetrumpsfear View Post
    Good review, though pretty short, given how many cameras they were testing.
    It looks like they totally misunderstood how RED ONE works though - it seems they're making their judgement based on the live monitor output, not the actual recorded files.

    This neglects all the benefits of shooting raw. It's like judging a pro digital SLR still camera solely based on it's jpg images, or more accurately, the live preview LCD.


    Reply With Quote
     

  4. Collapse Details
    #4
    Senior Member Stevet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Arizona City, AZ
    Posts
    1,981
    Default
    True, the RED ONE SDI out was meant for monitoring and only offers a downsampled image for preview. You need to use the RAW data for comparision.


    Reply With Quote
     

  5. Collapse Details
    #5
    Senior Member Hunter Hampton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    LA
    Posts
    2,845
    Default
    They should have thrown a film camera in there and made comparisons using the video tap!
    Hunter Hampton
    hunterismyfriend.com
    vimeo.com/hunter


    Reply With Quote
     

  6. Collapse Details
    #6
    Cute Member Mattykins's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    2,293
    Default
    Glad to see the F23 taking the cake.

    But the actual design of the test I think was pretty flawed.
    "I reject your reality and substitute my own"
    MKTG Film, Film Marketing 101


    Reply With Quote
     

  7. Collapse Details
    #7
    Default
    Yes, the test is a bit lacking. Also the screen grabs were missing some of the cameras. I wanted to see with my own eyes how EX1 would fare.


    Reply With Quote
     

  8. Collapse Details
    #8
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    8
    Default
    I agree. To really do a test, you need an expert for each camera present to make sure you show it at its best.


    Reply With Quote
     

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •