Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 13 of 13
  1. Collapse Details
    #11
    Senior Member davhud's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Home, USA
    Posts
    131
    Default
    Panasonic has done a terrible job of making producers aware of the advantages of using the P2 system. It's almost like they don't care or expect everyone else to pitch it for them.
    Also the software support for P2 from Panny is pretty bad. P2cms has got to be one of the worst interfaces I've ever seen. That is if you can even figure it out from the manual thats written in english as she is spoken.
    It would really help market penetration if they would streamline the P2 workflow or at least make it more transparent to non tech types like producers.


    Reply With Quote
     

  2. Collapse Details
    #12
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Fort Worth Texas
    Posts
    51
    Default
    I agree, their support does make it difficult sometimes to market P2 to others that aren't quite sure about it.


    Reply With Quote
     

  3. Collapse Details
    #13
    Mod v2.0 Noel Evans's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    10,861
    Default
    Quote Originally Posted by davhud View Post
    Panasonic has done a terrible job of making producers aware of the advantages of using the P2 system
    Im 50/50. As far as networks go there has been a lot of marketing, so Im not having issues there. But outside that, unless the producer is particularly used to p2, you have to work it.
    w: Noel Evans TV

    e: noel@noelevans.tv
    p: +61 (0) 408 455 374


    Reply With Quote
     

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •