Ultimately yes, it's the fault of Apple for insisting on converting away from the native file format when no other editor makes you do that. However, that's completely overcomable on both sides -- on the Apple side you can use Raylight and edit the native MXFs and never run into this again. Or, on the Windows side, now that the damage is done, you can use the Raylight Quicktime Decoder and access the Quicktime DVCPRO-HD files.
So either way Marcus can bail you out.
Results 21 to 30 of 42
-
Moderator
- Join Date
- Sep 2003
- Posts
- 49,284
01-23-2008 09:46 AM
-
Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2005
- Posts
- 47
01-23-2008 06:57 PM
Hey guys, I just picked up Raylight Encoder Pro and I like what it does so far. I have a question. I shot 720P 24PN HVX footage that was ingested into FCP. So now it's Apple DVCPro HD quicktimes right?
I need to edit this stuff in Vegas 7. The QT files in Vegas read:
Video: 960x720x24, 23.976 fps progressive, Raylight DVCPro HD 720p60
Audio: 48hz, 16bit Little Endian
According to Raylight's online help, they advise creating a custom project template 1280x720, progressive scan, 1.0 square pixel aspect ratio, 23.976 frame rate.
When I bring the clips onto this Vegas timeline, it's squashed centercut with black bars on each side. So I right click the clip and uncheck "maintain aspect ratio" in properties. It looks okay.
My question is should the timeline properties be 960x720 instead of 1280x720? Also is there an easier way to get the footage tp proper aspect without having to uncheck the ratio box on every single clip? I have hundreds of them!
Mahalo in advance.
VinceIf can, can, if no can, no can.
-
01-24-2008 06:09 AM
Project settings of 960 x 720, 1.333 Pixel Aspect Ratio is an acceptable way to edit and might have slightly better performance.
To change the PAR for all the clips at once, use a script. There is a free script for that on the DVFilm website: http://dvfilm.com/raylight/raylightTutorial2-5.htm
contact DVFilm Support for more infoDVFilm Raylight Decoder http://dvfilm.com/raylight/decoder
DVFilm Raylight Encoder Pro http://dvfilm.com/raylight/EncoderPro
DVFilm Raylight for Mac http://dvfilm.com/raylight/mac
-
Moderator
- Join Date
- Sep 2003
- Posts
- 49,284
02-01-2008 12:16 PM
Okay, so if the freely-distributed and freely available Panasonic codec isn't that easy to hook into Quicktime, then can someone explain why they couldn't use the freely-distributed and freely-available Avid Quicktime codec for Windows?
This can't be rocket science, guys. There are at least two fully free codecs available on the Windows platform. One of 'em is already a Quicktime codec. Surely they could tap into that.
I am quite certain they could do this if they wanted to. I can see why they might not want to (Apple supporting an Avid codec?) but -- that'd be a business decision, not a technical one. And, unfortunately, a business decision that punishes the consumer.
-
02-01-2008 01:48 PM
Much too slow, cannot decode to native frame size, and is made by a competitor.
$95 for Raylight Decoder is just about free and I imagine that is Apple's preferred solution to the problem.
The same thing with Avid and Raylight MXFX, it's cheap, it's off the shelf,
problem solved.DVFilm Raylight Decoder http://dvfilm.com/raylight/decoder
DVFilm Raylight Encoder Pro http://dvfilm.com/raylight/EncoderPro
DVFilm Raylight for Mac http://dvfilm.com/raylight/mac
-
Moderator
- Join Date
- Sep 2003
- Posts
- 49,284
02-01-2008 02:32 PM
It is slow, I'll grant you. But don't you think Apple should make Quicktime files play on Quicktime?
Using your product is great, I have nothing against your product at all. I just don't understand why people blame Windows or Microsoft or Bill Gates or Space Aliens or anyone else in the world for the fact Quicktime Windows can't deal with Quicktime Mac files...
... in any case, THANK YOU for doing all that you've done to solve these problems of various manufacturers not playing nice with each other! You're truly a hero to the HVX community!
-
Moderator
- Join Date
- Dec 2005
- Location
- Inland Northwest
- Posts
- 12,926
02-01-2008 03:24 PM
My guess is that there are some royalty issues or licensing ones with using the DVCProHD codec in something other than a FCP install.
Just a guess. If so, that would be Panasonic's ball park, not Apple's.
-
Moderator
- Join Date
- Sep 2003
- Posts
- 49,284
02-01-2008 06:47 PM
Again, there are already existing free codecs that are freely distributable on the Windows platform. The royalty and licensing issues are solved, the codecs already exist. They just have to tap into them.
They're not GOING to, we know that already. But at least we know that it's an active corporate decision to just not do it, rather than any stumbling block of licensing or royalties or anything like that.
-
-
Moderator
- Join Date
- Sep 2003
- Posts
- 49,284
03-12-2008 08:06 PM
The DVCPRO-HD decoder lets you do anything you need to. Watch 'em, convert 'em, edit 'em, whatever.









