View Full Version : Whoops - I underexposed 4 stops!!!
boothba
11-14-2006, 11:37 AM
Here is a quick attempt to color correct underexposed Red footage. Nice latitude dude.
mikkowilson
11-14-2006, 11:40 AM
Impressive.
- Mikko
JTmoney
11-14-2006, 11:47 AM
Very nice indeed
Stephen Williams
11-14-2006, 12:00 PM
Here is a quick attempt to color correct underexposed Red footage. Nice latitude dude.
Hi,
Thats like using a high ASA & recording in Raw, I do it all the time with my Nikon D70.
The pictures look very good IMHO.
Stephen
boothba
11-14-2006, 12:33 PM
I think I titled this thread incorrectly - assuming my math is right it should have read "underexposed 5 1/2 stops" (f11 - f64/95 split)
Jarred Land
11-14-2006, 12:46 PM
thats great boothba, nice work :)
boothba
11-14-2006, 12:50 PM
If they post the f2 exposure I'll see if we can get a match on the way up - and you know what that means... yes the fabled 11 stops! :zombie_smiley:
ericyoung
11-14-2006, 12:53 PM
Hmm. How do I turn on the picture. Have not been seeing pictures attached to posts.
I've checked the FAQs already. Thanks for any info!
mikkowilson
11-14-2006, 01:29 PM
Eric,
In your User CP (top left) under "Edit Options" there is a checkbox for "Show Images" under thread display.
- Mikko
JDHolloway
11-14-2006, 09:46 PM
Wow, I'm stunned.
While I'd like to see a proper comparo vs the Viper/f900 and Kodak. I will have to judge this against a previous test on CML for what its worth.
http://www.cinematography.net/Pages%20GB/Film-Digi-comparison.htm
Still it's damn damn damn impressive.
Craig Ryan
11-14-2006, 10:43 PM
holy cow!
ericyoung
11-15-2006, 09:31 AM
Eric,
In your User CP (top left) under "Edit Options" there is a checkbox for "Show Images" under thread display.
- Mikko
Thanks Mikko, but that's not it. Already checked that and it was selected. Even tried toggling it off and then on and refreshing - no joy.
The only way I just found to make the images display is to have my forum "Display Mode" set to Threaded (not Linear or Hybrid), and then to select away from the post with the attached thumbnail and then back to the post, when mysteriously the thumbnail appears. Not exactly convenient!
Done a virus and spyware scan and nothing suspicious.
Weird. :huh:
TimurCivan
12-09-2006, 10:58 AM
try doing that with DVX footage..... :(
Brook Willard
12-09-2006, 07:19 PM
Comparing the DVX to the RED is like comparing a $100 point-and-shoot to a true DSLR... it's ridiculous and pointless.
[edit: wow, that was kind of harsh... perhaps I could've phrased it better]
TimurCivan
12-09-2006, 07:23 PM
umm yes.. that was my point. :)
Brook Willard
12-09-2006, 08:09 PM
http://homepage.mac.com/brookwillard/hvx.jpg
Here are some bracketed HVX shots I did a while back for fun. Levels were matched [to varying degrees] to the 2.8 shot.
And my point was... why even bring it up? I wouldn't rip around the track in a Ferrari and say "Try doing that in a Honda Civic!"
Jarred Land
12-09-2006, 08:11 PM
im not gonna comment on why there is blood coming out of your taps brook..
but nice work.
Brook Willard
12-09-2006, 08:13 PM
Plumbing tape!
TimurCivan
12-09-2006, 09:14 PM
Ex-Wife!
lpcvideo1
12-09-2006, 09:19 PM
Ex-Wife wrapped in plumbing tape!
Brook Willard
12-09-2006, 10:11 PM
She's in my faucet.
mikkowilson
12-10-2006, 03:04 AM
...Erm ... Those wouldn't happen be full resolution grabs would they Brook?
- Mikko
Brook Willard
12-10-2006, 12:09 PM
Nope, 50%. I'll put up full grabs in a few minutes.
Brook Willard
12-10-2006, 12:12 PM
Enjoy (http://homepage.mac.com/brookwillard/hvx2.jpg).
I didn't do the best job matching the over/underexposed images... but you can at least get the picture from this experiment.
Ex-Wife!
Sure thing tim. Best out of that one buddy. Ksssst, (as the top comes off the beer). Congrats, here's to the future.