Kjetil Haugen
09-24-2006, 10:42 AM
Feel it would be nice to get a sense of perspective by comparing RED (a camera in develpment) and existing cameras that we already know.
Personally I think the Panavision's Genesis has proven that digital can be a substitute for film, so I'd like to hear som tech-talk from you guys. What are the simularities or differences between RED and Genesis.
Topics: The look and feel of the images, workflow, iso, shutter, you name it...
The Viper is also a good comparison. This "Zodiac" trailer looks promising. David Fincher shot the feature uncompressed...
I'd like to throw in another question while I'm at it... These expensive lenses like Cooke and Zeiss.. what exactly makes them superior. How does the Cooke lens contribute to the look of RED's bublegum still image for example? How would it look with a slightly cheeper lens?
Personally I think the Panavision's Genesis has proven that digital can be a substitute for film, so I'd like to hear som tech-talk from you guys. What are the simularities or differences between RED and Genesis.
Topics: The look and feel of the images, workflow, iso, shutter, you name it...
The Viper is also a good comparison. This "Zodiac" trailer looks promising. David Fincher shot the feature uncompressed...
I'd like to throw in another question while I'm at it... These expensive lenses like Cooke and Zeiss.. what exactly makes them superior. How does the Cooke lens contribute to the look of RED's bublegum still image for example? How would it look with a slightly cheeper lens?