mike the beginner
09-21-2006, 03:54 PM
4K is impressive no doubt. Red will sell on that alone....However. Since it has been said by experienced people on this forum that most red users will probably use 1080p rather than 4k, how good will red's 1080p compare to others? Lets ignore the fact that you can shoot 4k and down scale to 1080p and concentrate on what we actually get.
First thoughts for me is in the lattitude and low light specs. 11 stops maybe 12 or who knows maybe even higher! That has got to be impressive compared to other camera'a. A real winner for red surely?
Low light: The sensor is what, around 5.4 microns (guessing from memory here) surely the bigger the pixels the better the low light performance right? A real winner for red surely?
However what about resolution in 1080p, how does that compare with other camera's. I read on this forum somewhere that to get full resolution in 1080p you really need more than two million pixels. Does the size of the sensor pixels then put red at a disadvantage at 1080p?
I know resolution is not everything, but ignore that for the time being and give an opinion on what you think.
Michael
First thoughts for me is in the lattitude and low light specs. 11 stops maybe 12 or who knows maybe even higher! That has got to be impressive compared to other camera'a. A real winner for red surely?
Low light: The sensor is what, around 5.4 microns (guessing from memory here) surely the bigger the pixels the better the low light performance right? A real winner for red surely?
However what about resolution in 1080p, how does that compare with other camera's. I read on this forum somewhere that to get full resolution in 1080p you really need more than two million pixels. Does the size of the sensor pixels then put red at a disadvantage at 1080p?
I know resolution is not everything, but ignore that for the time being and give an opinion on what you think.
Michael