isho
04-26-2006, 09:03 AM
Im not quite sure if this particular post belongs in this subject, but I didn't know where else to put it.
I'm a mostly inexperienced Mexican film-maker about to embark on his first long-feature film. Medium budget by Mexican standards, but definitely (extremely) low budget by First World Country standards (namely the U.S.). Up until I read some articles on different sites, I was positive that my best camera choice was the new Panasonic HVX200, but now a few new contenders have come across as posibilities: JVC GY-HD100U and the Canon XL H1.
So my question is quite bold so to say: Which one should I go for considering I'm aiming for a theatrical release?
My budget is enough for two cameras, and maybe a set of not so expensive lenses. Its probably enough to rent a good DVC-PRO HD camera, but I'm inclined on having two cameras on set. I will probably sell the equipment after I'm done with the shooting, confident that it will be a good move financially. But that's besides the point. I'm not a highly technical guy, and the DP hasn't worked with any of these "low priced" HD camcorders. We are shooting in july, and we already have one of Mexico's top actresses attached to the project, so we have a fair chance of making it, comercially speaking.
Some comments I read on the Panasonic HVX200 caught my attention, especially those regarding poor theatrical screening. As far as color goes, I thought of it as an excellent choice. Noise? Well, I don't know, depends if its bearable. But no theatrical release? I don't think its a possibility for me considering the project.
The JVC GY-HD100U seemed like the better choice then, at least according to what those guys on Fox's show 24 had to say. But some people dont seem to give it all that much credit because of its codec. The JVC homepage mentions something about an upgrade, but I dont think it fixes that problem. I also read that the quality of image was mostly achieved by using quite expensive lenses. Unless i rent them, they are probably out of my league. Would I be able to achieve good quality images with less expensive lenses? And most importantly, would I be able to show my product on a theatre?
And last, the Canon XL H1, which seems to be some people's choice for theatrical releases. I was just a bit thrown off by some comments regarding colors, and a video-y quality. Plus, I have worked with previous versions of Canon camcorders, and I was never fully convinced of their quality in recording. I may be wrong with this model, though.
So, to sum it all up:
Which one is the better choice for an indie film that will most likely be pitched to distribution companies and sent to festivals? (As far as image goes, of course, considering we operate it correctly.)
I would really appreciate it if someone can point me in the right direction.
Thank You!
Joseph Levinson
Monterrey, Mexico
I'm a mostly inexperienced Mexican film-maker about to embark on his first long-feature film. Medium budget by Mexican standards, but definitely (extremely) low budget by First World Country standards (namely the U.S.). Up until I read some articles on different sites, I was positive that my best camera choice was the new Panasonic HVX200, but now a few new contenders have come across as posibilities: JVC GY-HD100U and the Canon XL H1.
So my question is quite bold so to say: Which one should I go for considering I'm aiming for a theatrical release?
My budget is enough for two cameras, and maybe a set of not so expensive lenses. Its probably enough to rent a good DVC-PRO HD camera, but I'm inclined on having two cameras on set. I will probably sell the equipment after I'm done with the shooting, confident that it will be a good move financially. But that's besides the point. I'm not a highly technical guy, and the DP hasn't worked with any of these "low priced" HD camcorders. We are shooting in july, and we already have one of Mexico's top actresses attached to the project, so we have a fair chance of making it, comercially speaking.
Some comments I read on the Panasonic HVX200 caught my attention, especially those regarding poor theatrical screening. As far as color goes, I thought of it as an excellent choice. Noise? Well, I don't know, depends if its bearable. But no theatrical release? I don't think its a possibility for me considering the project.
The JVC GY-HD100U seemed like the better choice then, at least according to what those guys on Fox's show 24 had to say. But some people dont seem to give it all that much credit because of its codec. The JVC homepage mentions something about an upgrade, but I dont think it fixes that problem. I also read that the quality of image was mostly achieved by using quite expensive lenses. Unless i rent them, they are probably out of my league. Would I be able to achieve good quality images with less expensive lenses? And most importantly, would I be able to show my product on a theatre?
And last, the Canon XL H1, which seems to be some people's choice for theatrical releases. I was just a bit thrown off by some comments regarding colors, and a video-y quality. Plus, I have worked with previous versions of Canon camcorders, and I was never fully convinced of their quality in recording. I may be wrong with this model, though.
So, to sum it all up:
Which one is the better choice for an indie film that will most likely be pitched to distribution companies and sent to festivals? (As far as image goes, of course, considering we operate it correctly.)
I would really appreciate it if someone can point me in the right direction.
Thank You!
Joseph Levinson
Monterrey, Mexico