Alvise Tedesco
04-22-2006, 05:42 PM
And all of you more experienced than me, need help, please..
Planning to shoot a Doc. in June. Budget too tight to use higher end cam. I'm asking myself if I can achieve better photography with an HVX in dv50 instead of dv25 from my DVX. Easily one can say yes, for the better color space/compression.
Here's the wrong side: I want 16/9, but release will be (broadcast, not dvd) 4/3 standard definition.
So,
Shoot anamorphic, edit anamorphic, and before going to tape, downscale and letterbox?
Isn't downscaling degrading so much that is maybe better to directly letterbox my DVX?
Shoot HVX letterbox?
Isn't then an absolute no-more wide angle lens, extracting the middle portion from the ccd?
Thanks.
p.s. Is my english good enough to understand 90% of your (Barry) HVX guide? Who knows? Is it easy as, for example, Paul wheeler's "Digital cinematography"?
Planning to shoot a Doc. in June. Budget too tight to use higher end cam. I'm asking myself if I can achieve better photography with an HVX in dv50 instead of dv25 from my DVX. Easily one can say yes, for the better color space/compression.
Here's the wrong side: I want 16/9, but release will be (broadcast, not dvd) 4/3 standard definition.
So,
Shoot anamorphic, edit anamorphic, and before going to tape, downscale and letterbox?
Isn't downscaling degrading so much that is maybe better to directly letterbox my DVX?
Shoot HVX letterbox?
Isn't then an absolute no-more wide angle lens, extracting the middle portion from the ccd?
Thanks.
p.s. Is my english good enough to understand 90% of your (Barry) HVX guide? Who knows? Is it easy as, for example, Paul wheeler's "Digital cinematography"?