PappasArts
02-17-2006, 07:49 PM
Res Charts, fabric charts and a Macbeth chart filmed. SDI captures and HDV of the same test charts.
http://cineform.blogspot.com/2006/02/canon-xl-h1-filmout-results-awesome.html
Here is a quote about how well the XLH1 did up against the f900!
<<< It can be stated emphatically that the XL H1 when printed to 35 mm film really looks excellent – colors, shadows, highlights, range, low noise, etc. It held up very well to the F900. I’m not sure why, and it was a surprise to us, but the F900 had a noisier appearance than the XL H1.>>>>>
<<<When recording HDCam to tape the spatial resolution is 1440 x 1080 (same as HDV) with 3:1:1 chroma (versus 4:2:0) and 8 bits of precision (same). >>>>
<<<< It held up very well to the F900. I’m not sure why, and it was a surprise to us, but the F900 had a noisier appearance than the XL H1.>>>>>
Now who can argue with the XLH1 color space even being in the same ballpark as a F900. WOW!
http://cineform.blogspot.com/2006/02/canon-xl-h1-filmout-results-awesome.html
Here is a quote about how well the XLH1 did up against the f900!
<<< It can be stated emphatically that the XL H1 when printed to 35 mm film really looks excellent – colors, shadows, highlights, range, low noise, etc. It held up very well to the F900. I’m not sure why, and it was a surprise to us, but the F900 had a noisier appearance than the XL H1.>>>>>
<<<When recording HDCam to tape the spatial resolution is 1440 x 1080 (same as HDV) with 3:1:1 chroma (versus 4:2:0) and 8 bits of precision (same). >>>>
<<<< It held up very well to the F900. I’m not sure why, and it was a surprise to us, but the F900 had a noisier appearance than the XL H1.>>>>>
Now who can argue with the XLH1 color space even being in the same ballpark as a F900. WOW!