PDA

View Full Version : Decorating The Torrance Rose Float, Time-Lapse



BobDiaz
12-29-2010, 10:08 AM
Background:

From December 26 to December 30, volunteers are hard at work decorating the Rose parade Floats. On Monday, I went down to the City Of Torrance Rose Float to shoot the video of the decorating; however, rather than do it in normal motion, I decided that time-lapse might be more interesting:


http://vimeo.com/18260702

http://vimeo.com/18260702


Shooting The Video:

For the indoor shots, I decided to use a 1 frame per second rate and to add to the feel of movement, I set the exposure to 1/2 a second. If you think about it, 1/2 a second is a 180 degree shutter for 1 frame per second and provides the right amount of motion blur to the image.

For each shot, I would set the exposure to 1/60 of a second, zoom in to focus, lock the focus setting, and zoom out as needed. Then I would change the exposure to 1/2 a second. I used the faster frame rate for focus, because it opened the iris and was easier to see the correct focus.

In setting the exposure, I used the waveform monitor to judge how much to open the iris to get the key parts. Many times people were in shadow and I needed to correct for that. Next, I double checked with the zebras to make sure I wasn't blowing out the parts I wanted. I kept both the iris and focus in manual mode to avoid any unexpected changes during shooting.

One nice thing about the HMC40 is the fact that it gives the time of the footage you recorded, not how long you have been standing there. This allowed me to judge when I've shot enough footage. At first I chose to only shoot only 12 to 13 seconds of finished footage, but later on decided to increase that to around 20 to 30 seconds. It turned out in editing, that the extra time allowed me some extra wiggle room to shift things around and find the best parts.

In general, you don't shoot time-lapse hand held, but when I followed June (the woman with the red shirt and red hair), the results were better than I would have expected. Most of the pans and zooms were done in post. Taking 1080/24p to 720 allows for up to a 1.5x zoom without loss of sharpness. A few times I went a little above that. There was one spot in the video where the girl stood up and I had to VERY slowly pan the camera upward to follow her.

The spot in the video where I give a thumbs up (2:45), I had to count the seconds to get the speed of my arm to look correct. Unfortunately, EVERYONE had to ask me what the heck I was doing, so my lips move a mile a minute.

The outdoor shots were done at 1080/24p and speeded up 10x in post. I lacked a strong enough ND filter to be able to slow the shutter speed down to 1/2 a second.


By the way, having done Rose Float Decorating for many years, I can safely say that the video does show what it feels during the decorating. We only have 5 hectic days to get this done and there's a lot of work to be done.

I return on Thursday to help finish the City Of Torrance's Float.


Bob Diaz

Garion
12-29-2010, 03:03 PM
Very nice Bob, its nice to see good timelapse in action :) you've got me thinking about trying some myself.

cheers

Andy

Greg Smith
12-29-2010, 04:56 PM
Very nice! Can you describe the lighting in the workspace, and if you had to do much color correction during post? Thanks!

BobDiaz
12-29-2010, 05:31 PM
The lighting was mixed, mostly overhead florescent lights with some skylights. In general, mixed lighting can cause problems with colors, BUT in this case, the roof was quite high to allow the floats to fully extend. Thus, the different colors of the light sources were able to blend in without too much of a difference across the shot. While I see a few shots I should have tweaked the colors a bit, I didn't do any color correction in post.

The first time-lapse shot had the fast shutter and is a bit jumpy, but after that I remembered to change the shutter to 1/2 a second. The good news was that the F-Stop was around F4 to F7.2 depending on the lighting.


Bob Diaz

Mike Beckett
12-29-2010, 11:45 PM
Superb Bob, just superb - I loved that. An interesting new twist on timelapse there. You're right, the handheld bits worked out quite well, and the zoom had me scratching my head for a while until I read about your "cheat".

And that bloke at about 2:45 giving the thumbs up... just spoilt the whole thing for me! :D

dan.carter
12-30-2010, 04:56 PM
Dang! I'm exhausted! But that was fun.

I think the thumbs-up guy was an Alfred Hitchcock cameo appearance.

BobDiaz
12-30-2010, 06:58 PM
The 1/2 a second exposure seems to produce a pleasing result. I'll have to try a time lapse at night driving down the road with a 1 FPS and a 1/2 second exposure. As for daytime footage, that's going to require 6 F-Stops of ND to allow for a 1/2 a second exposure during daylight.

Neutral Density Factors: • ND 0.3 (exposure adjustment = 1 stop, reduces ISO 1/2) • ND 0.6 (exposure adjustment = 2 stops, reduces ISO 1/4) • ND 0.9 (exposure adjustment = 3 stops, reduces ISO 1/8) • ND 1.8 (exposure adjustment = approx. 6 stops, transmits 1% of light,) • ND 3.0 (exposure adjustment = 10 stops, transmits 0.1% of light) An ND 1.8 would do it, but anything up to an ND 3.0 should work for full sun.


Bob Diaz

Mike Beckett
01-04-2011, 12:59 PM
Bob,

Just a thank you for the inspiration on the timelapse. I've used that technique on some nice timelapses I took when on holiday in Scotland, and it really adds something. Excellent idea!

BobDiaz
01-05-2011, 08:27 PM
Here in "Sunny California" we haven't had a sunny day for a while; so I can't go outside and test the camera settings under full sunlight. From what I recall, a ND1.8 should be about right, but may be a bit too much if lighting isn't full sun.

Maybe the solution is to get an ND0.6 and a ND1.2, if lighting is full sun, stack them both together and if it's less, use ND1.2 or ND0.6 ... However, the F-Stops allow for around 4 Stops between F8 --> F2. (F2, F2.8, F4, F5.6, F8) It's about 5 stops if I go from F1.8 to F10.5, adding the gain to +12dB and I have 7 F-Stops of range. Maybe ND1.8 is about right; I'm not sure without testing it.

According to the weather report, it looks like I have to wait until Friday for full sun to find out....



Bob Diaz

BobDiaz
01-07-2011, 10:12 AM
I have not had ideal conditions yet for running the test, but if you set the shutter speed to 1/120 of a second it's very close to putting an ND1.8 on the lens of the camera and shooting at 1/2 of a second as far as exposure. In my tests, I keep seeing around F8 for the iris setting.

IF one is shooting around snow or one a white sandy beach, you are likely to need a higher ND filter to get the proper 1/2 a second exposure. I'm not sure, but maybe ND2.1 or better yet, ND2.4

Maybe having an ND1.9 and an ND0.9 may be the best choice of filters.

If anyone else wants to try the test of setting the shutter speed to 1/120 and read the F-Stop, I'd love to hear what your results are.


Bob Diaz

Mike Beckett
01-11-2011, 12:59 PM
Bob, what about a fader ND?

Something like this: http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/676812-REG/Genus_GL_GNDF_52_52mm_ND_Neutral_Density.html

With a step-up ring, of course. You can go all the way to ND 3.0!

I'm seriously considering one of these. Only thing I'm not sure about is the optical quality, but it may be fine for timelapse work.

I'm having almost no luck sourcing decent 43mm filters in the UK, and importing them from B&H is expensive, shipping and improt duties almost doubles the $ price.