alpi69
02-10-2009, 01:00 PM
this was a test for me. will the HPX perform superior and comparable to the 2/3创cams that i use normally?
http://vimeo.com/3082241
conclusion: the HPX500 is IMO 2 stops faster and gives a very clean image. Maybe not SONY clean, but that easily is outweighed by the Panasonic Mojo. The image is incredible. I did not have time to play with the settings. arrived at the event , packed out the camera, changed settings a little according to LCD look and then shoot.
the Fujinon "stocklens" performed better than expected, the camera behaves just like any other professional 2/3创camera (and I handle one of those 3-5 times a week).
The viewfinder is not the best in the world, but it was giving me reliable focus. Still....room for improvement.
Overall: great cam, the HVXs shots are easy to be picked in this clip: the latitude, sharpness and noise are "terrible" when put next to the HPX500. A dark shoot with light on snow and dark background is just too much for the 200....
http://vimeo.com/3082241
conclusion: the HPX500 is IMO 2 stops faster and gives a very clean image. Maybe not SONY clean, but that easily is outweighed by the Panasonic Mojo. The image is incredible. I did not have time to play with the settings. arrived at the event , packed out the camera, changed settings a little according to LCD look and then shoot.
the Fujinon "stocklens" performed better than expected, the camera behaves just like any other professional 2/3创camera (and I handle one of those 3-5 times a week).
The viewfinder is not the best in the world, but it was giving me reliable focus. Still....room for improvement.
Overall: great cam, the HVXs shots are easy to be picked in this clip: the latitude, sharpness and noise are "terrible" when put next to the HPX500. A dark shoot with light on snow and dark background is just too much for the 200....