CINEMEK G35 vs BREVIS

[PIMP]

So i currently shoot with the brevis. However the cinemek g35 has caught my eye. Before I drop the money on a new adaptor I am wondering if you guys could provide me some insight on what make the look of the cinemek more appealing (at least to my eyes) I am thinking it is more diffused that is why it has a more film look. Am I missing anything else? Any experiences with it here? Because that film shot by MACGREGOR blew me away.

I am wondering if I placed a different cinefuse such as the new cfxl into my brevis i would get a similar look.

thanks for the time

o

[astigmatic]

they are like polar opposite adapters. The g35 is all about bokeh rendition without attention to light loss. The Brevis placess light loss above bokeh. I think the blade would be somewhere in-between. I'm personally waiting to see more samples of the Fiber gg, to see if I'm going to stick with the brevis. I can't get myself to spend more money on the cinefuse elements because the cf2 and 3 have been somewhat dissapointing to me.