View Full Version : redone vs. SI-2k vs. f23 vs. f900 vs. phantom hd vs. EX1

08-30-2008, 07:47 PM
there is the link, the test is in spanish.

www.ccdcolombia.com/comparativo/comparativo2.htm (http://www.ccdcolombia.com/comparativo/comparativo2.htm)

11-06-2008, 01:47 PM
If peeps are a) interested, and b) monolingual:

http://translate.google.com/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ccdcolombia.com%2Fcom parativo%2Fcomparativo2.htm&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&sl=es&tl=en

Good review, though pretty short, given how many cameras they were testing.

Thanks for the link!

11-15-2008, 01:56 AM
Good review, though pretty short, given how many cameras they were testing.

It looks like they totally misunderstood how RED ONE works though - it seems they're making their judgement based on the live monitor output, not the actual recorded files.

This neglects all the benefits of shooting raw. It's like judging a pro digital SLR still camera solely based on it's jpg images, or more accurately, the live preview LCD.

11-15-2008, 04:09 PM
True, the RED ONE SDI out was meant for monitoring and only offers a downsampled image for preview. You need to use the RAW data for comparision.

Hunter Hampton
11-16-2008, 02:32 PM
They should have thrown a film camera in there and made comparisons using the video tap!

11-17-2008, 02:44 PM
Glad to see the F23 taking the cake.

But the actual design of the test I think was pretty flawed.

11-18-2008, 08:46 AM
Yes, the test is a bit lacking. Also the screen grabs were missing some of the cameras. I wanted to see with my own eyes how EX1 would fare.

12-07-2008, 09:59 PM
I agree. To really do a test, you need an expert for each camera present to make sure you show it at its best.