grahamdunn
04-14-2008, 01:18 PM
Hi all, please help! I've always interpreted interlaced footage in D-Beta as lower fields and just gone on with my life, but now I'm finding the files I render out look different.
Basically I'm getting interlaced SD footage as targa sequences and importing them into AE. I interpret the footage as lower fields (no pulldown necessary...this has been added in when the footage is transferred to D-Beta and our AVID only wants 29.97) and do my compositing, then render out. I do NOT set the footage to lower fields when I render out, I simply render back out as targas. When I open the same frame of the raw footage I received and the footage I rendered out after compositing, the original frame looks ripped like an interlaced file usually does (and like it does in AE before I interpret it as lower). The footage rendered out once I interpreted it, on the other hand, looks progressive (no ripping, like what the footage looks like after AE interpretation).
What does the interpretation do? It is not de-interlacing, though the overall look is the same, because there's no processing or anything that takes time...
Should I interpret as lower and then render back out as lower? We've tried in the past and had problems (it looks like it's taking lower fields and then setting it to lower fields yet again, causing a fielding problem when we reimport).
When I interpret and render, why does the file I render out look progressive? It looks absolutely identical when we reimport into the AVID at 29.97, but the targas before and after AE look different.
I thought the interpret fields setting was temporary just so that you don't have to deal with the interlaced frames ripping.
Thank you!
Basically I'm getting interlaced SD footage as targa sequences and importing them into AE. I interpret the footage as lower fields (no pulldown necessary...this has been added in when the footage is transferred to D-Beta and our AVID only wants 29.97) and do my compositing, then render out. I do NOT set the footage to lower fields when I render out, I simply render back out as targas. When I open the same frame of the raw footage I received and the footage I rendered out after compositing, the original frame looks ripped like an interlaced file usually does (and like it does in AE before I interpret it as lower). The footage rendered out once I interpreted it, on the other hand, looks progressive (no ripping, like what the footage looks like after AE interpretation).
What does the interpretation do? It is not de-interlacing, though the overall look is the same, because there's no processing or anything that takes time...
Should I interpret as lower and then render back out as lower? We've tried in the past and had problems (it looks like it's taking lower fields and then setting it to lower fields yet again, causing a fielding problem when we reimport).
When I interpret and render, why does the file I render out look progressive? It looks absolutely identical when we reimport into the AVID at 29.97, but the targas before and after AE look different.
I thought the interpret fields setting was temporary just so that you don't have to deal with the interlaced frames ripping.
Thank you!