PDA

View Full Version : Eliminating additional shooting fees in National Parks



n8ture
03-13-2008, 08:26 PM
I just wanted to preface this post by saying that I discussed putting up this thread with Jarred and the mods to make sure they were ok with it since it could be considered something political.

The purpose of this thread is to inform and educate and is in no way intended to start a discussion on politics which is not the purpose of this forum. Such a discussion would result in the locking and deletion of this thread.

Its purpose is to inform you that there is a possible solution on the table to eliminate additional shooting fees in our national parks.

This is something that not only effects shooters in the states but would effect filmmakers from all over the world.

Currently small production companies are lumped into the same group as the major motion picture companies.

Any filming in National Parks for commercial purposes requires a permit, location fees and other fees may be applicable.

One or two filmmakers with minimal equipment such as just a camera and tripod are exempt from location fees but are still required to pay for a permit and additional fees may be applied as well.

The current law was never intended to include the small indie film crew but language was never included to exempt the independent.

Still photographers are exempt from this law as they lobbied to have language included in the current law to exempt them from these requirements.

A bill is currently in committee that will allow the small film and video companies of five or less crew members to be exempt from any fees other than a single yearly permit which would cost $200.

Currently you would need a permit for each park you wished to shoot on and would likely have to pay additional fees on top of that.

Below is a summary of the bill that is currently in committee:

H. R. 5502
To amend Public Law 106-206 to direct the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture to require annual permits and assess annual fees for commercial filming activities on Federal land for film crews of 5 persons or fewer.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

February 27, 2008

Mr. BOREN (for himself and Mr. YOUNG of Alaska) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Agriculture, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To amend Public Law 106-206 to direct the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture to require annual permits and assess annual fees for commercial filming activities on Federal land for film crews of 5 persons or fewer.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. PURPOSE.

The purpose of this Act is to provide commercial film crews of 5 persons or fewer access to film in areas designated for public use during public hours on Federal lands.
SEC. 2. ANNUAL PERMIT AND FEE FOR FILM CREWS OF 5 PERSONS OR FEWER.

(a) In General- Section (1)(a) of Public Law 106-206 (16 U.S.C. 460l-6d) is amended by--
(1) redesignating paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) as subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C), respectively;
(2) striking `The Secretary of the Interior' and inserting `(1) IN GENERAL- Except as provided by paragraph (3), the Secretary of the Interior';
(3) inserting `(2) OTHER CONSIDERATIONS- ' before `The Secretary may include other factors'; and
(4) adding at the end the following new paragraph:
`(3) SPECIAL RULES FOR FILM CREWS OF 5 PERSONS OR FEWER-
`(A) For any film crew of 5 persons or fewer, the Secretary shall require a permit and assess an annual fee of $200 for commercial filming activities or similar projects on Federal lands administered by the Secretary. The permit shall be valid for commercial filming activities or similar projects that occur in areas designated for public use during public hours on all Federal lands administered by the Secretary for a 12-month period beginning on the date of issuance of the permit.
`(B) For persons holding a permit described in this paragraph, the Secretary shall not assess, during the effective period of the permit, any additional fee for commercial filming activities and similar projects that occur in areas designated for public use during public hours on Federal lands administered by the Secretary.
`(C) In this paragraph, the term `film crew' includes all persons present on Federal land under the Secretary's jurisdiction who are associated with the production of a certain film.'.
(b) Recovery of Costs- Section (1)(b) of Public Law 106-206 (16 U.S.C. 460l-6d) is amended by--
(1) striking `collect any costs' and inserting `recover any costs'; and
(2) striking `similar project' and inserting `similar projects'.

HorseFilms
03-14-2008, 07:05 AM
Good info. Thanks, Kevin!:beer:

n8ture
03-24-2008, 04:47 PM
A recent request at Yellowstone National Park for a permit to shoot video using a single camera was responded to by rangers with confusing answers including permit fees and insurance fees along with having to have a ranger present. When asked about still photography no permit was required.

The group of 4, 20% to 70% disabled veterans who shoot nature video for stock and DVD release asked why and were given confusing answers. Such as you might get in trouble out there, these veterans are all Special Forces Trained with combat experience from Viet Nam and probably know more then the rangers about survival.

The question now being ask by Veterans Groups is if the veterans which were rejected and not allowed to shoot because of permit costs and ranger requirements and have paid the price to have parks in this country, who want to make a living shooting video are rejected by the Park Service who thinks of them as a major productions companies instead of individual, making it impossible for them to earn a living, then the stories of how the Park Service treat individual producers are true.


Letters from Veterans groups to congress are now asking that questions, as the group was allowed to shoot in several National Parks on the East Cost and in Utah, but not Yellowstone proving there is no consistent policy or procedure and discrimination is a strong possibility.

A proposed change in the existing law could change that if it passes allowing a yearly charge for single team camera crew to shoot on all Federal Controlled land including National Parks, for a fee of $200.00.

Veterans groups are asking for the immediate passage of the proposed changes to the law, and warning Congress and Park Service of the backlash that could occur from veterans in support of disabled veterans just trying to make a living if the law is not changed.

H.R. 5502 can be viewed at:
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h110-5502