PDA

View Full Version : how is hv20 footage for compositing?



kiyong
08-23-2007, 03:41 PM
does the way the hv20 handles 24p affect compositing? i'd be using after effects to mess with the footage.

Tibby
08-23-2007, 06:27 PM
I suppose that depends on whether or not you intend to conform it to actual 24 frames per second or leave it embedded in 60i. I don't do much compositing, but my understanding is that progressive footage is the best option.

Personally I always convert my HV20 footage to 24p. Even just to edit with.

What NLE are you using?

kiyong
08-24-2007, 02:08 AM
i'd be using final cut and after effects. i haven't done too much compositing yet either (i just signed up for a class). i read that the hv20 doesn't have flags to properly pull the 24 frames? is that correct? or is there a workaround of some kind?

vsansal
08-24-2007, 09:38 AM
i'd be using final cut and after effects. i haven't done too much compositing yet either (i just signed up for a class). i read that the hv20 doesn't have flags to properly pull the 24 frames? is that correct? or is there a workaround of some kind?

Yes it is true, HV20 doesn't have flags but it is not a problem for you since you have after effects which can detect the cadence and remove the pulldown.

Tibby
08-24-2007, 05:03 PM
Hmmmm... I did not know that about after effects....I'll have to give that a shot. I just converted it with compressor using the reverse telecine option outputting to ProRes.

MOVIE STUNTS
09-04-2007, 09:10 AM
Works great in Shake.

Carniphage
09-12-2007, 05:18 AM
Long time listner, first time caller.

Just tried using some footage I shot on vacation to mess with (digitally).
I shot in 24p cine mode.
Recovered the 24p version into ProRes422 using Apple Compressor Reverse Telecine.
Took the footage and tracked it.
Tracking is supposed to be tricky on account of the rolling shutter issue, but I didn't see any problem, despite it being a *very* shaky hand-held shot.

Comped on an obligatory space ship with Lightwave. Rendering directly onto the background plate.

As a first go, everything worked better than expected.

C.

Barry_Green
09-12-2007, 09:37 AM
Russ Andersson, maker of SynthEyes, recommends avoiding all rolling-shutter CMOS cameras for compositing work.
http://cybermessageboard.fatcow.com/ssonte/viewtopic.php?t=478

Carniphage
09-12-2007, 11:26 AM
Russ Andersson, maker of SynthEyes, recommends avoiding all rolling-shutter CMOS cameras for compositing work.
http://cybermessageboard.fatcow.com/ssonte/viewtopic.php?t=478

Will he be lending me cash to upgrade?

Seriously, as long as the track works and the outcome looks good enough, I don't really care.

A camera that lets me do this for 500 UK pounds is simply amazing.

http://homepage.mac.com/brilliantdigital/.public/falconpier264.mov

(This URL should now work!!)

Matt Agnello
09-13-2007, 11:29 AM
Wow. Scathing review of the CMOS sensor and the rolling shutter. Very useful information. But the rhetoric is coming from a expectation of perfection, which I think would be a good perspective when dealing with more expensive cameras, but you get what you pay for with this machine in my opinion.

marketmd
09-13-2007, 12:07 PM
I don't use SynthEyes, but used Boujou with HV20 matchmoving with no problem.